|
LECTURE 8: MODELS OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
Today, all humans
are classified as belonging to the species Homo sapiens sapiens. However,
this is not the first species of hominids: the first species of genus
Homo, Homo habilis evolved in East Africa at least 2 million years
ago, and members of this species populated different parts of Africa in a
relatively short time. Homo erectus evolved more than 1.8 million years
ago, and by 1.5 million years ago had spread throughout the Old World. Virtually
all physical anthropologists agree that Homo sapiens evolved out of
Homo erectus. Anthropologists have been divided as to whether Homo
sapiens evolved as one interconnected species from H. erectus (called
the Multiregional Model, or the Regional Continuity Model), or evolved only in
East Africa, and then migrated out of Africa and replaced H. erectus
populations throughout the Old World (called the Out of Africa Model or the
Complete Replacement Model). Anthropologists continue to debate both
possibilities, and the evidence is technically ambiguous as to which model is
correct, although most anthropologists currently favor the Out of Africa
model.
Advocates of the Multiregional model, primarily Milford Wolpoff and his
associates, have argued that the simultaneous evolution of H. sapiens in
different parts of Europe and Asia would have been possible if there was a
degree of gene flow between
archaic populations.[33] Similarities of morphological features
between archaic European and Chinese populations and modern H. sapiens
from the same regions, Wolpoff argues, support a regional continuity only
possible within the Multiregional model.[34] Wolpoff and others further argue
that this model is consistent with clinal patterns of phenotypic
variation (Wolpoff 1993).
According to the Out of Africa Model, developed by Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews, modern H.
sapiens evolved in Africa 200,000 years ago. Homo sapiens began migrating
from Africa between 70,000 - 50,000 years ago and would eventually replace
existing hominid species in Europe and Asia.[35][36]
The Out of Africa Model has gained support by recent research using mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA). After analysing genealogy trees constructed using 133 types of mtDNA,
they concluded that all were descended from a woman from Africa, dubbed Mitochondrial
Eve.[37]
There are differing theories on whether there was a single exodus, or several
(a Multiple Dispersal Model). A Multiple Dispersal Model involves the Southern
Dispersal theory,[38] which has gained support in recent
years from genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence. In this theory,
there was a coastal dispersal of modern humans from the Horn of Africa around
70,000 years ago. This group helped to populate Southeast Asia and Oceania,
explaining the discovery of early human sites in these areas much earlier than
those in the Levant. A second wave of humans dispersed across the Sinai
peninsula into Asia, resulting in the bulk of human population for Eurasia. This
second group possessed a more sophisticated tool technology and was less
dependent on coastal food sources than the original group. Much of the evidence
for the first group's expansion would have been destroyed by the rising sea
levels at the end of the Holocene era.[38]
In a recent article, Leonard Lieberman and Fatimah Jackson have called
attention to the fact that although the concepts of cline, population, and
ethnicity, as well as humanitarian and political concerns, have led many
scientists away from the notion of race, a recent survey showed that physical
anthropologists were evenly divided as to whether race is a valid biological
concept. Noting that among physical anthropologists the vast majority of
opposition to the race concept comes from population geneticists, any new
support for a biological concept of race will likely come from another source,
namely, the study of human evolution. They therefore ask what, if any,
implications current models of human evolution may have for any biological
conception of race.[39]
Lieberman and Jackson have related the multiregional theory to race with the
following statement:
Lieberman and Jackson have related the Out of Africa theory to race with the
following comment:
“ |
There are three major implications of this model for the race
concept. First, the shallow time dimension minimizes the degree to which racial
differences could have evolved [...]. Second, the mitochondrial DNA model
presents a view that is very much different from Carleton Coon's (1962)
concerning the time at which Africans passed the threshold from archaic to
modern, thereby minimizing race differences and avoiding racist implications.
However, the model, as interpreted by Wainscoat et al. (1989:34), does describe
"a major division of human populations into an African and a Eurasian group."
This conclusion could best be used to emphasize the degree of biological
differences, and thereby provide support for the race concept. Third, the
replacement of preexisting members of genus Homo (with little gene flow) implies
several possible causes from disease epidemics to extermination. If the latter,
then from a contemporary viewpoint, xenophobia or racism may have been
practiced"[41] |
” |
Lieberman and Jackson have argued that while advocates of both the
Multiregional Model and the Out of Africa Model use the word race and make
racial assumptions, none define the term.[40] They conclude that "Each model
has implications that both magnify and minimize the differences between races.
Yet each model seems to take race and races as a conceptual reality. The net
result is that those anthropologists who prefer to view races as a reality are
encouraged to do so" and conclude that students of human evolution would be
better off avoiding the word race, and instead describe genetic differences in
terms of populations and clinal gradations.[42]
End
of Course
Course
Message Board
|
Prof.
Anvers Email
|